menifee live - tell a friend
Movie Times  |  Schools  |  Churches  |  Parks  |  Museums  |  Golf Courses  |  Events  |  Community  |  Kids Stuff  |  Games  |  Photo Gallery  

City Council Candidates Forum
by Menifee Live Staff

Menifee Valley California - This evenings City Council Candidates Forum, held at Paloma Valley High School was a huge success.

The excitement of the evening was only dulled by the logistics of allowing each of the 19 candidates a 2 minute introduction and summary. 19 candidates will be on the ballot, and at least two others have been confirmed as write-ins. Anthony Cuomo was the only write-in candidate to participate. The other candidates in attendance were Tony Amatulli, Dina Biedermann, Darci Castillejos, Dean Deines, John Denver, Wallace Edgerton, Tom Fuhrman, Ken Gaunt, Scott Mann, Louis Mazei, Marc Miller, Jason Reeves, Carol Sullivan, Jerry Stamper, Chris Thomas, Fred Twyman, Gerald Walker and Dorothy Wolons. Darcy Kuenzi was not in attendance, nor represented in the Forum.

Third District Supervisor Jeff Stone moderated the event and started by thanking Joe Dougherty for all of his efforts in bringing incorporation to the ballot. Members of the Menifee Advisory Committee were in attendance as well the captain of the sheriff's Perris station, James McElvain, and the Director of the EMWD board, Ronald Sullivan.

The format was simple and constituents were given score cards to record their own opinions. The candidates each gave a two minute introduction; a series of yes/no questions; a specific question and direct question; and another two minute closing statement. Supervisor Stone's sister, Lori Stone-Ruben and MAC member Mike Mata kept everyone on schedule with hand signals and colored prompt cards.I was impressed with the quality of the questions created by Supervisor Stone, his staff and the Menifee Advisory Committee. Skeptic that I am, I expected fluff all around, and I was very pleasantly surprised.

Candidates were asked about their specific intentions in running for office, rent control policies, City Manager salaries, traffic, rate of growth, developer responsibilities to our parks and more than I could jot down answers to. One direct question that amused me personally and had half the panel declining to comment was related to the opponents. Given that a city council needs to work as a team, Supervisor Stone asked the candidates to name the one candidate they would least like to work with. The question drew applause and surprise from the audience and some squirming from the candidates.

Another question that I applaud Supervisor Stone for asking had to do with a candidates support of a 'home town advantage'. The scenario given was a city contract open for bidding receives an outside bid of $10,000.00 and a local contractor bid of $12,000.00. Supervisor Stone asked if the local contractor should be given a "home town advantage" since the business owner paid local business fees, etc. Should they be given any advantage? The panel overwhelming said no. Considering half the candidates are members and/or officers of the Menifee Valley Chamber of Commerce, I was surprised. I personally believe that city contract decisions should be weighted on more than just lowest bid, and assuming quality and certification wasn't in question, than advantages should be built in, fully disclosed and available for local, minority, women and disabled owned businesses. Most 'weighted' policies for government contracts are created to help level the playing field.�I'm surprised that the obvious value of local preference didn't strike home with the candidates. That's just this writer's opinion of course, but if I see contracts going to Orange and San Diego county, with NO consideration to locals then I'll not be a happy camper.

It was a very long evening, but handled as expeditiously as could be. If you missed it, please find another forum before June 3 so that you can make an informed decision. This fledgling council has a lot of great candidates that deserve your consideration.

Back

Comments

Dina for City Council By Visitor on May 01 2008 at 9:17 PM
Well written article. Jeff Stone was a fine moderator. I actually was one of the few voices who did answer 'YES' to the home town advantage question. I believe keeping revenue local is very important. You can count on me for this.
Scott A. Mann - Campaign for City Council By Visitor on May 03 2008 at 4:00 PM
The question of a "hometown advantage" was a good one. I too voted 'yes' on this question.

The goal should always be to uphold ethics in government and business while simultaneously seeking ways to creatively and legally incentivize local businesses to produce goods and services. Expanding the local tax base is the best way to increase revenue for a municipality. That said, one needs to be careful about the appearance of impropriety in public contracting.

If it is legal, ethical and the right thing to do for our business owners and the bid is competitive...I will always vote to give the nod to a local business!

//s// Scott A. Mann
Rebuttal to the 'NO' on Measure F Crowd By Visitor on May 05 2008 at 6:24 AM
Sunday, May 4, 2008

To All Voters -

I had the privilege of being handed a VOTE NO ON MEASURE F - CITYHOOD flier yesterday. Let me just say that I cannot believe the rhetoric that is contained on this flier. It is filled with untruths! So, what I'd like to do is transcribe this flier paragraph by paragraph and offer my counter-arguments to their false claims.

FLIER QUOTE PARAGRAPH 1 - "We are in a recession and paying more for food, gas, electric, heating, water, and trash. With the incorporation of Menifee City more of our tax dollars will go to 5 member City Council and their employee's with no new benefits to the residents of Menifee, Sun City, Romoland and Quail Valley. $24,262,785.00 tax dollars are the tentative estimates for expenses of the new city for the first full year and will continue to increase each year after per the Menifee Incorporation Committee fiscal analysis draft." - END QUOTE PARAGRAPH 1

COUNTER-ARGUMENT - We are not in a recession. A recession occurs when the country's gross domestic product, more commonly known as GDP, goes down for two consecutive quarters. This has not occured. In fact, GDP increased in the 1st quarter of this calendar year by .6%. I would agree that the economy is stagnated and that we are all feeling inflation in the areas listed in the flier. With respect to revenue and expenditures, the first year of incorporation, which is called the "Transition Year" is estimated to have $6.2 million in revenue over $1.8 million in expenditures. This creates an operating reserve of $4.4 million at the end of the Transition Year (October 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009). The new city is REQUIRED BY LAW to maintain an Emergency Reserve of 10% and an Operating Reserve of 10% for a combined total of 20%. The author of the NO ON MEASURE F FLIER does not know what they are talking about.

FLIER QUOTE PARAGRAPH 2 - "I think this is a high price to pay for Local Government Control and not receive any new services. If you vote for Menifee Cityhood residents will have to pay special tax assessments, city sales tax, and or bonds to get a police dept, fire dept, parks, city street repairs, and recreation services. Property owners are now required to pay for a bond that voters passed on February's ballot that will add $20.00 per each $100,000 property tax value on top of their regular tax bill for the next 20 years to build 3 new Menifee Schools. Can you afford to be taxed more by the new Menifee City Council? - END QUOTE PARAGRAPH 2

COUNTER-ARGUMENT - This parapgraph is so off the mark that it scares me that someone can actually think this way! The County of Riverside receives $1.25 for every $100.00 dollars spent in sales tax revenue. Because we are unincorporated, we only receive .25 cents of that money and the County keeps the remaining $1.00. When we incorporate as a City, WE KEEP ALL $1.25. It is estimated that we bleed off to other surrounding cities over $6 million in sales tax revenue. When we become a city, that money stays home in Menifee. With respect to the Measure B School Bond, the figure is actually $17.00 per $100,000 of assessed value PER YEAR. My final commment on this paragraph is this, the new City Council cannot raise your taxes. Proposition 218, a California Constitutional Amendment passed by voters in November 1996 requires new taxes to be approved by voters by a 2/3 thirds majority (66%). The City Council can require certain fees to be paid but, they cannot raise your taxes!

FLIER QUOTE PARAGRAPH 3 - The State is $3.32 billion in the red; The County is tightening its belt and the home building at lowest level in 14 years. Mortgage defaults are at an all time high. Property tax revenue growth for 2007/2008 down 4% and for 2009/2010 down 2%. Inland Valley unemployment at 7.1%. Incorporation of the City of Menifee Valley is not financially stable at this time as we are in a recession and it is going to get worse in the next two years. Now is the time to tighten our belts and put cityhood on the back burner. - END QUOTE PARAGRAPH 3

COUNTER-ARGUMENT - None of the data points listed in this paragraph adversely effect the fiscal solvency of our new city. As mentioned early, we must maintain a 20% reserve of revenue over expenditures by law. According to Dataquick Research group in La Jolla, California, mortgage defaults PEAKED in October 2007. The upcoming state budget gap is expected to be $16 billion and not $3.32 billion as suggested by the author of the flier.

Dear Readers,

The VOTE NO ON MEASURE F crowd are obviously passionate about how they feel. Just don't be bamboozled by information on a flier that is not correct. Educate yourselves on the process by going to the LAFCO website at http://www.lafco.org/opencms/quick_links/MenifeeIncorporationDocuments.html.

One of the biggest take aways from the Comprehensive Fiscal Analysis (or CFA) is that the city is fiscally viable even in an economic slowdown! Lets bring that sales tax revenue home to our new City instead of giving it to the County and all of the surrounding cities. With this revenue, we can enhance law enforcement services, improve infrastructure and community appearance, and maintain the quality of life that we all want to enjoy!

VOTE 'YES' ON CITYHOOD!

Sincerely,

//s//Scott A. Mann
Candidate for Menifee City Council

Whos supporting who? By Visitor on May 15 2008 at 9:42 AM
Thats the real question to be asked. I moved to Menifee 2 years ago from Murrieta because it reminds me how Murrieta used to be when I was growing up. I am all for menifee becoming a city, just as long it is not lead by corrupt politicains in the pocket of certain developers. I know these developers have a stake in this election, I would like to find out who is backing these candidates before I decide where to give my vote to. I hope Menifee does not become another Murrieta-like political scene where councilman are doing things that can get them indited.
Who is supporting who? By Visitor on May 16 2008 at 10:35 AM
Your question is interesting if it relates to money, and can be found out through campaign disclosures at the registrar of voters office. They don't maintain their website well enough to count on the online records being up to date. Initial reports were filed which showed only 4 members spending and/or receiving contributions over $1000.00. I could publish what I have, but it's been widely reported that only Kuenzi has accepted money that wasn't from constituents. There is one more deadline they have before the election and I will pick that up and publish it.

I have to say though that I’m not as concerned as some about Kuenzi’s war chest. I’ve been involved in enough fund raising efforts to know that you accept donations regardless of what the givers' motives are. If you know your motives are sound, you just throw out the net. For example, just because Pechanga tribe donates to the school system, doesn’t mean the school district condones or supports ‘gaming’ or the tribal politics. Just because a candidate accepts donations from a developer doesn’t mean they are doing anything underhanded. It could have come out of the developer’s marketing fund for all we know. Goodwill is a tangible commodity and no one has done anything wrong. Part of being a successful city is attracting the right developers to our area, so I think it’s premature to be calling foul at this stage. I expect our city council and future city manager to have good relationships with future and existing developers.

Your question does bring to light also, the motives behind some of the candidates. Although each candidate did answer that question at the forums, most had some altruistic answer. A few "Johnny one notes" have a specific cause that they feel strongly about. Densisty, protecting rural life, equestrian trails, protecting the core, or even the write-in candidate who is angry about property values. I understand them better than the ones with the 'give something back' reasons. It's those with the pat answers I would worry about most. Even Jeff Stone cites "GRAFITTI" as his reason for taking a stand locally, and then later moving into politics.

It is an interesting question though. For many this is their first experience with the political process. It's fine with me if they don't "KNOW" everything yet, and it would bother me if they thought they did. I want to find the council members with the most integrity, and who is the most visionary to move Menifee to a place we can all be proud of....and nothing like temecula or murrieta.

mieke@menifeelive.com
Dina for City Council By Visitor on May 20 2008 at 11:50 AM
Some valid concerns are mentioned in these posts, about city council and who is donating to campaigns. As a candidate I come into this process as a 'citizen legislator', to represent my fellow residents. I owe no special interests any favors, nor have I established any relationships with any special interests for the purpose of becoming electing. One of my major campaign platforms is keeping the elected city council accountable to voters. I have pledged to always conduct business openly, if I am elected. I will not have any secret meetings, or make any back room deals to feather my own nest. I have also proposed a joint city council/ homeowners association committee which each homeowners association would send a representative to meet with city council to discuss city matters. This will allow the city council a direct link to residents to get a sense of what is working as well as what can be improved. This will also give residents a direct link to their elected officials. Who best to give the elected city council a sense of their job performance than the residents who elect them.
If any further questions or comments please contact me at dina@dina2008.com I look forward to any questions or comments.
Marc Miller Candidate for City Council By Visitor on May 21 2008 at 11:24 AM
I have represented the community for ten years before the County of Riverside, Local Agency Formation Committee, and the Riverside County Planning Commission. When I was chair of the Menifee Valley Community Economic Development Counsel we circulated the petitions that led to where we are today. The stinkey smelly Sludge was stopped in our area thanks to me, and another group we created.

The Sun City/Menifee/Quail Valley area has been greatly impacted by housing development. The County takes the developer impact fees and puts them into the general fund for all of Riverside County to draw from. We end up getting stuck with more bonds for schools (deemed necessary due to development) that we have no control over. It is time we decide where the money needs to be spent.
Look at the issues the "No on Cityhood" group comes up with, and their answer "we need a new Supervisor", Our Supervisor Mr. Stone represents 475,000 people in his district alone. Mr. Stone sits on a committee with four other supervisors who in turn represent 2 million others. What voice do we have if they decide to put a homeless shelter here? Or anything else? 1 in 5???
It is time for local control. Our world is not flat!! We do have issues that still remain here that need to be addressed here namely "POLICE, and TRAFFIC.
Please vote for someone who has put alot of effort and personal time (no compensation, just gratification) to the community at large! Vote yes on Cityhood, and Vote for Marc Miller!
Support the Good and Keep out the Bad By Visitor on May 29 2008 at 10:44 AM
I strongly agree that contracts need to be broadly looked on, especially if local companies will not hire minorities or disabled. I believe in supporting the local community and keeping our own employed here. I do not agree that Scott Mann is the right fit for Ciy council as his Risk Management has fallen short in the school district when it comes to our kids. He is a yes person and would not be an effective council member. Raise opposition sometimes!

Add Comment